| Home | Free Registration | Resources | RSS |
|
|
| The Health Record Review by Patty Enrado |
It'll take more than money to spur EHR adoption
Posted on Mon, Feb 08, 2010 - 01:37 amI don't believe anyone in the healthcare industry believes ARRA will single-handedly drive up EHR adoption among providers. Of course, the hope is that the federal incentive money will bring physicians, for whom cost is an issue, into the fold. But what's going to really move the needle on EHR adoption?
The answer is simple, but it's a multi-pronged approach: Agencies and organizations that receive data from physicians for their various programs such as quality and pay-for-performance initiatives should require the data to be aggregated, documented and sent electronically. They should also encourage EHR vendors to make it easy for physicians to collect whatever existing or new data is required.
A recent example is a new policy being instituted by the National Institutes of Health. NIH is requiring its physicians to document radiation levels of their patients who are exposed via CT scans or other imaging procedures. Vendors that provide their imaging equipment to NIH must provide software that documents radiation levels and transmits that information to the patient's EHR. The thought is to have Google Health and Microsoft HealthVault enable access to the radiation data, which would be replaced later by a national EHR system.
Other organizations should follow suit. With the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services leading the way on the payer side, commercial payers that have or are planning to implement patient-centered medical homes or pay-for-performance programs should require data capture and reporting to be done via EHRs. For PCMHs, EHRs would also help enable continuity of care, but that's another topic entirely.
EHR vendors can help their cause by aligning their products' capabilities with what the market is requiring, outside of the meaningful use criteria.
The federal or state governments need not be the only ones drawing up policies to drive EHR adoption. If a good number of a provider's business partners require the use of an EHR, the EHR system becomes an invaluable office equipment and tool. And that is a pretty good business case.
- Recent blog entries
- Login or register to post comments






Comments
What will really boost EHR adoption is those records being easily interchangeable. EHR is a valuable resource, and should be faced as such. Many "wanna be" EHR applications using proprietary formats will simply put physicians in a positions similar to that of a fully equipped Zulu warrior left alone in the middle of Ukraine: he has its resources, Ukrainians have theirs, but they cannot cooperate at all, once nobody knows each other's language. Interchangeability will not be naturally born from competition, and I'm afraid the gold rush for the US government's money might promote the appearance of many information islands in the field.
Good point. I believe, however, EHR vendors understand that their products need to be able to talk with other systems. The market won't support them; they're more knowledgeable now. That said, there are interface vendors whose products will connect disparate systems. They're doing it now. You'll be seeing it at the HIMSS10 Interoperability Showcase in Atlanta in a few weeks.