Bookmark and Share PrintE-mail
  The Health Record Review
by Patty Enrado


CCHIT says IFR on standards and certification may slow adoption rate

With some standards being dropped and others being added, the Interim Final Rule (IFR) for EHR standards and certification is not aligned with CCHIT's current certification process. If the Final Rule is largely unchanged from the IFR, CCHIT says the new process could slow down the EHR adoption rate.

Given that many systems have been certified under CCHIT, the charges would seem to support the criticism. That said, however, HHS is looking to expand the number of certification bodies. Since those new entities would be starting afresh, following whatever HHS puts out in its Final Rule would not create an issue for them or the EHR vendors that choose go to them for certification.

The other thing to consider is that the IFR for EHR standards and certification is aligned with the meaningful use criteria, which makes obvious sense. Any changes and the final rules will reflect that synergy and alignment.

Back to CCHIT’s situation, the question to ask is how many systems would be truly impacted by the changes. And then multiply that by how many installations of those systems are in the market. My shot-in-the-dark guess would be “enough to create a headache.”

Obviously, HHS is not out to create more barriers. Rather, the department is trying to move the needle. If moving the needle to advance EHR adoption requires a significant market adjustment, the anticipated deceleration will need to be blunted somehow, which is what HHS will need to figure out once the final rules come out. Admittedly, this will be a major task but a necessary one in order to calm the market.


Comments

AHA is also requesting that ONC remove the electronic claims submission and electronic verification of insurance eligibility certification criteria. Part of lowering the cost of healthcare is automating as many processes as possible. Integration of administrative/financial data with clinical data is a critical component to streamlining processes testking 350-001. The Holy Grail is to integrate those two silos of information. The technology may exist to be able to do that, but we don't have large-scale, real-world experience in that area. To make it a requirement for 2011 may be a stretch. While it's not advisable to get rid of it completely, perhaps ONC should reintroduce it in level or stage 2 of the meaningful use criteria.

CCHIT took a very authoritarian and micro-managed approach to EHR/EMR certification. They certified the major vendors in "interoperability" but did not require them to interoperate with other vendors, especially highly developed niche application vendors. Just because CCHIT chose the methods it chose for certification, does not mean that IFR is not a better way to go.

CCHIT and its certification scheme are really a products of the major vendors and their attempt to keep a stranglehold on the enterprise healthcare IT market. It really had nothing to do with expanding the use and fostering creativity in the market.